BLOEMFONTEIN Jan 31 Sapa
COURT: 1 National Director Public Prosecutions v FH Geyser & another. (Howie P, Scott JA, Streicher JA, Van Heerden JA, Mhlantla AJA). Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998, s 50. Interpretation of section 50 in regard to an appeal and cross-appeal in relation to grant of forfeiture order. Application for forfeiture of house used as brothel and the requirements for grant of forfeiture order in terms of section 50.
COURT 2: IG van Bosch v MA Charles (Mpati DP,Maya JA, Combrinck JA). Contract. The purchase and sale of immovable property. Whether appellant's plea disclosed a defence. Whether respondent's refusal to comply with ancillery obligations constituted repudiation of the main agreement.
IUSTITIA: 1. MM Mlimo v The State / 2. Jaco G Swanepoel v The State. (Farlam JA, Mthiyane JA, Kgomo AJA). 1. Criminal law. Conviction and sentence for murder and attempted murder during an attempted hijacking. Sentence of life plus 12 years imprisonment. At issue is whether evidence of state witnesses should be accepted and whether accused received fair trial. 2. Criminal law. Conviction, an appeal against conviction on counts of assault, crimen injuria and failure to attend court. Appeal against the judgment delivered in the Pretoria High Court on August 14, 2006. Whether state proved beyond reasonable doubt that accused intended to assault and impair dignity of complainant.
Monday, 18 February 2008
COURT 1: GF Murray v The Minister of Defence. ( Mpati DP, Cameron JA, Mlambo
JA, Combrinck JA, Cachalia JA). Labour law. Glenville Frederick Murray appeals against the whole of the judgment on March 20, 2006 in the Cape High
Court. Constructive dismissal, SANDF. Former employee of the Minister of Defence, SA Navy. Resigned on June 11, 1997 from the SA Navy. Alleged that his resignation was due to constructive dismissal and instituted a claim for damages of R2.9 million. Question under appeal is whether events leading to appellant's resignation constitute constructive dismissal. Labour Relations
Act 66 of 1995 not applicable but whether appellant can rely directly on Constitution and right to fair labour practises.
COURT 2: DW Zietsman v Electronic Media Network Limited & others. (Streicher JA, Nugent JA, Heher JA, Hurt AJA, Snyders AJA). Procedure. Security for costs and whether appellant liable to furnish security for costs.
IUSTITIA: 1. J Griebenow v The State / 2. A Carolus v The State. (Navsa JA, Van Heerden JA, Mhlantla AJA). 1. Criminal law. Trial magistrate's finding of appellant's testimony claiming necessity reasonably possibly true.
Whether appellant should have been acquitted and whether finding by magistrate should have been taken into account at sentencing. 2. Criminal law. Conviction and sentence for indecent assault and eight years imprisonment. At issue is whether prosecution succeeded in proving identity of man who indecently assaulted eight year old male complainant.
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
COURT 1: Guardrisk Insurance Company Ltd v Registrar of Medical Schemes & another. (Howie P, Heher JA, Ponnan JA, Snyders AJA, Kgomo AJA). Short term
Insurance Act, No 53 of 1998. Definition of "accident and health policy" and in the Medical Schemes Act, No 131 of 1998 the definition of "business of a medical scheme" in the Act. Interpretation of these two definitions.
COURT 2: Gendor Holdings v City Fishing Holdings (Pty) Limited and another. (Scott JA, Farlam JA, Cloete JA, Combrinck JA, Hurt AJA). Shipping. Whether liquidation application stayed in terms of Admiralty Jurisdiction Regulation Act 105 of 1983, s 10A. Whether application for winding up should be granted.
IUSTITIA: 1. Wandisile Ntaka v The State / 2. Bongani Mthembu v The State. (Cameron JA, Maya JA, Cachalia JA). 1. Criminal law. Sentence of 10 years imprisonment with 4 years imprisonment suspended on charge of rape. At issue whether magistrate erred in not considering corrections supervision as sentencing option and whether magistrate erred in accepting probation officer's reports that appellant unsuited for corrections supervision. 2. Criminal law. Theft and robbery. The appeal against convictions and whether appellant's guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt.
-
31 Janvier 2008 à 10:50 dans
- zsandf (anglais)

