Romandie.com
 
Créer un blog | Noter ce blog | Signaler un abus
 
| Autre blog ? >>  

Mon séjour en Afrique du Sud (Cape Town)

ARMSCOR, SANDF TO HOST AIR SYMPOSIUM.

Armscor and the SA National Defence Force will be hosting an air defence symposium in October to discuss joint air defence in the African environment, an SANDF spokesman announced on Thursday.

Brigadier General Les Lombard said air defence was a critical capability for any defence force, but such defence was only really effective when a number of neighbouring countries operated a joint air defence plan.

This was why the theme of the symposium was to be "Air Defence in the African Environment." Prominent military speakers from Africa and further afield were expected to participate, said Lombard.

The symposium would also look at equipment and systems and their suitability for the African environment.

Twenty-nine papers had been received, said Lombard, and nearly half of these were from abroad.

The conference would run from October 29 to October 31 at the CSIR conference centre in Pretoria, he said. A detailed programme, along with a registration form, was available at http://www.sajads.co.za


Chippy Shaik Speaks Out About Arms-Deal Papers.

FORMER defence department acquisition boss Shamin "Chippy" Shaik is probably the person most central to any story of the arms deal. Using his official influence and position, Chippy is alleged to have colluded to earn huge defence contracts for his brother Schabir's arms company.

Schabir has been arrested and charged with having secret documents relating to the arms deal. Chippy is suspected of giving them to him.

In real life Chippy comes across a lot better than on television. He is friendly, which is more than a little surprising considering the media has probably written enough about the man to break most normal humans.

Chippy has never spoken to the fourth estate before, and the first thing he does is tell me how happy he is to be able to speak to the media now.

"You see, under the old minister of defence, Joe Modise, we were allowed to talk to the media. Anyone was free to give interviews and answer questions. Under Terror Lekota though things were different.

"Department of defence officials had to ask permission before speaking to the press. I was never given permission to talk though heaven knows how many times I requested permission. I was desperate to go on television when Carte Blanche did their story but I was not allowed."

The very first question I put to him is an obvious one to anyone who has followed the deal.

"Yes, I gave my brother the documents he has been charged with having. I admit it happily."

This is somewhat of a shock. Chippy's brother Schabir has been charged, and is out on bail, for having what the state contends are highly classified cabinet minutes and other documents relating to the arms deal. Chippy has just confessed to me that he is an accomplice in what the state alleges is a crime.

Chippy explains himself: "You see there are two documents involved. The first is a letter to the secretary of defence that I wrote. The second are notes of what happened during part of a cabinet meeting. They were both given to Schabir by me, and I absolutely make no apology for doing so.

"My brother has been charged with two offences relating to these documents. The first is theft, the other relates to having broken laws that protect state secrets. I am not particularly close to my brother, but for his sake I wish this trial would get to court as soon as possible.

"It will be so easy for my brother to clear his name in court, but until such time as that happens everybody looks at us as though we are criminals.

"In terms of department of defence rules the only person who can classify documents is the person who writes the document.

"The rules also say that documents should not be classified unless there is a legitimate reason for doing so.

"One wants to be seen to be open and transparent.

"I never classified the letter I wrote to the secretary of defence, and the secretary never complained to me that I should have classified the letter.

"The letter was in no way classified. Schabir was entitled to have it.

"Secondly, neither the secretary for defence, nor I, have laid a complaint of theft relating to this letter, so I find it strange my brother is alleged to be a thief. Who after all has complained of a theft? What is the offence?

"Then, what everybody has been describing as cabinet minutes are not in fact cabinet minutes. They were my own rough notes.

"I attended a cabinet meeting as a representative of the department of defence, and made some notes to share with my colleagues the notes only concerned a small part of the meeting and were intended to help me write for internal department publications.

"The notes were hardly secret and again I admit giving them to Schabir. Dozens of other people in the department were also given the contents of those notes. Again I ask where is the crime?"

Pressed on why he handed over the documents, Chippy says: "I handed them over as they concerned attacks that were being made against ADS and Thales Schabir's companies. The letter to the secretary of defence was written to correct a factually incorrect impression that was doing the rounds about these two companies. I wrote the letter, and annexed some press clippings to it, in order to put the situation in perspective.

"I thought that as the contents directly impacted on Schabir I should copy him in the correspondence. There was nothing at all underhand about it. I often copied people into correspondence for the sake of being seen to be open and transparent. And one other important thing that nobody has picked up. The contracts had already been signed by the time I gave those documents to Schabir."

Asked about his conflict of interest, Chippy has an explanation too. Armscor, the state acquisition body, had no policy requiring conflicts or possible conflicts of interests be declared.

"When I mentioned my brother's arms company I was told to just ignore it. I was told that nobody ever bothered to declare these sorts of things and that, in the old days, it was accepted practice to award contracts to pals and relatives. I have heard of a case where an old-guard army general had a factory in his backyard producing military uniforms. He was given contracts by his pals in Armscor."

Having quit the department Chippy is into mining on a very small scale, he hastens to add. He is mining for a rare mineral called tantalum, a mineral used in the production of electronic goods. He says he can just about make ends meet but has no great wealth.

He is now known as Doctor Chips by his friends, having completed his Phd only a few weeks ago.

"I'm not bitter about what happened to me. My family and I are used to hard knocks and long ago I realised that you have to take what life deals you and smile.

"My brothers and I grew up in a coloured neighbourhood, and had to attend an Indian school. Thanks to the pencil test and the apartheid system we were all given different racial classifications. One brother was a Malay, the other a Cape Malay, the other an Indian. It was ridiculous.

"The upshot of it was that we lived in a coloured neighbourhood where the kids hated us for going to an Indian school. At school those kids hated us for living in a coloured neighbourhood. Every day we were in a fight. Almost every weekend we were stabbed. I almost lost my eye in a fight one weekend. Life was tough.

"Then my mother died on the freeway because the ambulance that was sent for her was a black ambulance and she was made to wait for the white one.

"It's not hard to see why we took to fighting the government of the day. But the Shaik family never fled the country. We stood and fought. I've been in many, many prison cells and jails as a result.

"I hate to blame apartheid for anything as it seems so fashionable to do so, but you can understand why my brothers and I sometimes come across short-tempered. It has not helped our image and nor has my enforced silence."

Chippy hardly looks the man of vast wealth one would expect. He drives a Mercedes but an old one he bought second-hand.

"Remember the scandal about Tony Yengeni and his cheap Mercedes? Well, I could have had one as well. I turned it down. I'm a man of some principles, despite what many claim. I'll let you in on a little secret though. The chief of the South African Air Force got one. He's never been prosecuted. Nor have a lot of other top brass from Armscor and the SANDF. But they are mostly the old-guard Afrikaner elements."

Shaik says he has battled financially as a result of the deal. On reading of his resignation from the department his bank foreclosed on his overdraft within a week. Nobody will lend him funds for his mine as they fear the bad publicity. Even his friends decline to do business with him openly lest they be suspected of corruption.

Even traffic cops those notoriously heartless beasts of the highway pity him. Doctor Chips tells a tale of how he was recently let off a speeding ticket as the traffic police recognised him and told him they felt that, even without a ticket, he was in enough trouble for any one man to handle.

Asked about the allegations he favoured his brother's arms companies, Shaik shrugs: "You know Schabir has not made the billions everybody thinks. You must realise Schabir is only a director and shareholder in Thales in this country. It is the French parent company that got the contract for the combat suite. My brother is not a shareholder in the French company so he sees none of that money.

"And let's not forget my brother lost out on the contract for the submarines a contract he was desperately trying to secure. As a result of that he had to close down most of his Mount Edgecombe factory."

As I am about to leave Chippy offers me a lift to the airport. His car smells a little of peri-peri chicken.

Earlier he had asked the waiter for a doggy bag to take home the remains of his lunch something one would hardly have expected from a man caught up in an international arms dealing skandaal.

Chippy is wearing a Swatch his daughter gave him, not the standard arms-dealer Rolex or gold Omega.

Driving along he shows some humour. "You know, in the old days people used to buy the (Mail & Guardian) simply to see if they were in it. It used to make me laugh watching officials skimming the papers in a nervous fashion to see if they featured. My best ever was reading a joke about myself: what do you get if you cross a vibrator with a potato? A Chippy Shaik.

"I really enjoy reading and watch the media quite closely. I really admire Zapiro the cartoonist. He's drawn a few cartoons at my expense, but he has great talent and obviously some courage. He takes on anyone who needs to be lampooned, and rightly so. We should have no holy cows. In fact, I really take my hat off to him as a Jewish person for standing up to the Israeli state and lampooning their leaders."

Driving along the N3 I admire a passing canary yellow Ferrari 355F1 GTS, as does Chippy.

"You know my dream, Paul? To hire a car like that and be seen driving it with a big cigar in my mouth. I'd like to see the way people would then gossip about the notorious arms-dealing Chippy Shaik and his vast wealth."


EX-SERGEANT JAILED FOR DEFRAUDING SANDF.

A former South African National Defence Force sergeant was jailed for five years by the Pretoria Commercial Crime Court on Wednesday on four counts of fraud, police said.

Captain Ronnie Naidoo said 32-year-old Evelyn Nobuntu Nikiwe Maduna, who was arrested in February in Lenasia south of Johannesburg, allegedly used two cheques to defraud the SANDF.

"The two cheques amounting to R1 143 555,09 were deposited into her own bank account during November 2001.

"During November 2001 she allegedly made a number of withdrawals, subsequently withdrawing the full amount by November 28 2001."

Naidoo said Maduna, at the time of the offence, was an employee of the SANDF station at the Lenasia Military base.

"She was performing duties as a senior accounting clerk and cashier."


SOLDIERS WIN THE RIGHT TO DEMONSTRATE.

In what the South African National Defence Union (Sandu) described as a second major triumph for labour rights in the SA National Defence Force (SANDF) this week, Judge J M C Smit struck down almost 15 regulations dealing with labour relations in the SANDF.

He also ordered Defence Minister Mosiuoa Lekota to return to the negotiating table immediately.

Smit was the second Pretoria High Court Judge this week to declare that Sandu had a right to collective bargaining and that the Constitution imposed an obligation on the Minister to engage in collective bargaining.

"The obligation to engage in collective bargaining is of particular importance in the present context since members of the SANDF are unable to secure their right to bargain collectively by strike action," Smit said.

"If the Minister is not burdened with an obligation to negotiate in good faith, SANDU will be deprived of any method of enforcing their "right to engage in collective bargaining."

Judge Eberhardt Bertelsmann on Monday granted an urgent temporary interdict to stop the redeployment of almost 8,000 soldiers, pending the outcome of proceedings before the Military Arbitration Board about restructuring and transformation in the SANDF.

Both Judges rejected an earlier ruling by Judge Johan van der Westhuizen, who said collective bargaining was a privilege and not a right.

The Minister of Defence withdrew from the negotiating forum and unilaterally promulgated the new regulations and announced the restructuring process on the strength of Van der Westhuizen's ruling.

In terms of Smit's ruling, Lekota's powers to appoint a Registrar of Military Trade Unions and members of the Military Arbitration Board were taken away to ensure the independence and impartiality of such appointees.

The appointment of one of Lekota's personal advisors as Registrar was set aside.

The Minister was given six weeks to amend the regulations concerning the appointment of the Military Arbitration Board's members. The order will not affect the validity of anything done by the Board in the past.

Soldiers will also now be able to take part in protest action and will be able to have union officials represent them at disciplinary and military court hearings. Restrictions on matters on which the union could negotiate were lifted and it will now be able to negotiate on all matters of mutual interest.


SANDF And US Forces in Joint Exercise for Peacekeeping.

A joint military exercise between South African and American airborne forces is being held in the Free State this month to train soldiers for peacekeeping duties.

American commander Colonel Frederick Jones said on Wednesday that Exercise Flintlock was routine, and not aimed at any planned joint operation.

"Flintlock is just a training exercise, no more and no less," Jones told journalists at a media day on the training ground outside Bloemfontein.

"There is no intention to make it a practice exercise for something operational in future," he said.

He nevertheless did not exclude the possibility of future cooperation between the two forces.

"The US and South African soldiers working together today, may do it again in a peace enforcement, peacekeeping or humanitarian relief operation.

"Let's get to know each other well now so we are good friends when the opportunity to work together again presents itself," Jones said.

The exercise is a biannual venture for the US Army and is frequently outside of the United States. South Africa was chosen for the first time this year.

More than 200 soldiers were taking part, with the American contingent consisting mainly of American Rangers from their 75th regiment. The South African side included soldiers from the 44th Parachute Regiment.

Jones said his country considered Flintlock as "very essential training". It was sponsored by their Joint Chiefs of Staff, with the current exercise having been planned 18 months in advance.

South African commander Colonel Mvuzo Mzinjana said Exercise Flintlock was an exceptional opportunity to train for peace support operations in Africa.

Troops were being coached to intervene in crisis situations, he said.


SAfrican court puts stop on defence department restructuring.

A Pretoria high court judge on Monday [14 July] sent a message to the SA National Defence Force that it had a duty to negotiate with military trade unions about matters that affected the working conditions of soldiers.

Judge Eberhardt Bertelsmann granted an urgent interdict to the SA National Defence Union (SANDU) to stop the Department of Defence from continuing with restructuring the SANDF pending the outcome of arbitration.

This means that the SANDF will not be able to go ahead with the redeployment of almost 8,000 soldiers, who were mostly earmarked to go to other government departments...

The judge said it was clear that the SANDF had unilaterally adopted a transformation structure similar to that of the civil service, but without any prior consultation with a military trade union.

SANDU'S request to negotiate with the Department of Defence was ignored, whereafter the union declared a dispute. The outcome of their dispute was pending before the Military Arbitration Board and was expected to be concluded shortly...


DEFENCE FORCE HAS TO NEGOTIATE WITH UNION - JUDGE.

A Pretoria High Court Judge on Monday sent a message to the SA National Defence Force that it had a duty to negotiate with military trade unions about matters that affected the working conditions of soldiers.

Judge Eberhardt Bertelsmann granted an urgent interdict to the SA National Defence Union (Sandu) to stop the Department of Defence from continuing with restructuring the SANDF pending the outcome of arbitration.

This means that the SANDF will not be able to go ahead with the redeployment of almost 8,000 soldiers, who were mostly earmarked to go to other government departments.

The application was the latest in a series of legal clashes between the Defence Force and the union. The union had to go to the Constitutional Court for the right to organise itself and receive recognition, as the SANDF was not prepared to recognise workers' rights.

The judge said it was clear that the SANDF had unilaterally adopted a transformation structure similar to that of the Civil Service, but without any prior consultation with a military trade union.

Sandu's request to negotiate with the Department of Defence was ignored, whereafter the union declared a dispute. The outcome of their dispute was pending before the Military Arbitration Board and was expected to be concluded shortly.

The union contended that it had a constitutional right to collective bargaining, but the Department of Defence relied on an earlier ruling by Judge Johan van der Westhuizen that collective bargaining was a freedom and not a right.

Bertelsmann rejected the ruling. He said he was unable to follow Van der Westhuizen's reasoning.

"In the absence of a right to strike, the denial of the right to collective bargaining would emasculate the labour rights protected by the Constitution and trade unions would be left to the whim or fancy of employers with no other recourse," he said.

He said the Constitution expressly elevated the demand to negotiate collectively to a right.

"The decision on which the respondents rely is clearly wrong. The denial of a right to bargain collectively cannot be upheld or condoned. Sandu has a clear right to collective bargaining and the Department of Defence has a clear duty to engage in the collective bargaining process and to await a ruling by the Military Arbitration Board.

"The applicant's rights have been infringed and they are entitled to the order they seek."

Sandu's national secretary Cor van Niekerk said he was overjoyed about the ruling, as it meant that the union would not in future have to run to court every time a dispute arose about its rights.

"I think the Defence Force is now in big trouble because our rights have been violated for the past two years with various policies on service benefits and conditions - including service hours, leave benefits, the merit process and redeployment - being changed unilaterally without consultation.

"This ruling means that all of the changes are unlawful, because none of it was negotiated with us. It also has huge financial implications, and the Defence Force will now have to explain to the Auditor General how they can justify payments on the strength of an unlawful policy.

"They will have to return to the negotiating table. Someone has to take responsibility for the illegal actions of the past two years," Van Niekerk said.


Union Takes SANDF to Court On Redeployments.

THE SA National Defence Union (Sandu) will today ask the Pretoria High Court to stop government from deploying 8000 soldiers to other government departments ahead of their retrenchment.

The move, according to the union, could jeopardise the benefits enjoyed by these employees.

"The defence force allows staff members to retain their medical aid after they retire, which does not apply in other government departments," says Dumisani Peter, Sandu's national organiser.

"Many people will also lose the benefit of years of service because a proper package has not been negotiated for them."

The union launched an urgent interdict in the Pretoria High Court asking that the process be halted to allow for sufficient time to negotiate better packages The case is to be heard, although the high courts are in recess.

Peter says the soldiers had been placed on an "exit list", which means it is just a matter of time before they are retrenched.

"All departments have undergone the same restructuring that the defence force has, so there is not much room for these people," he said.


SAfrican deputy defence minister leaves for USA 9 July.

Text of statement by South African Ministry of Defence published on South African news agency SAPA web site

The deputy minister of defence, Ms Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge, will leave for the United States of America tomorrow afternoon, 9 July 2003, to visit military veterans' support and educational programmes in Washington, New York and Baltimore as well as the National Veterans Training Institute in Colorado.

The aim of this study tour of military veterans' service organizations and flagship projects is to learn from organizations with extensive experience on military veterans issues in the US context, so as to draw best practices from these experiences and to assess their appropriateness in the South African context. In addition, the tour would serve to set up networks for capacity building and information-sharing relationship towards the development of military veterans associations in South Africa.

The deputy minister will lead an entourage of 12 participants from the SANDF, Technikon SA, Centre for Study of Violence and Reconciliation (CSVR) and members from South African military veterans associations.

Last year, the United States Department of Labour agreed to sponsor a pilot project for 40 MK [ANC's military wing] and APLA [Azanian People's Liberation Army] veterans. The CSVR and Technikon South Africa initiated "Tswelopele pilot project" which attempts to facilitate ex-combatants' reintegration into civilian society through the provision of psycho-social support and re-skilling. The pilot project has extensively engaged with the plight of ex-combatants who may have haboured feelings of anger, betrayal and sometimes abandonment when faced with a challenging socio-economic situation on their return.

Deputy Minister Madlala-Routledge is expected to return to South Africa on 17 July 2003.