The decision by the United Nations (UN) to award South Africa the rights to play host to one its largest gatherings, the World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD), displayed the kind of confidence and conviction that the international community holds for the country.
After all, the country had just been readmitted into the international pitch and had just enjoyed a mere ten years of action.
Critics were fuming and doubting Thomases were working around the clock trying to convince the UN that South Africa was not ready to host one of the biggest events in the UN's calendar.
However, having hosted high profile events such as the Rugby World Cup, the African Cup of Nations, the Non-Aligned Movement, World Conference Against Racism and the African Union, South Africa had to prove its mettle to the world through various aspects interrelated to the hosting of events of such magnitude.
Logistical and security issues were at the top of the agenda.
In an endeavour to stage an incident-free Summit that would linger in the minds of many for generations to come, government instituted a logistical company known as the Johannesburg World Summit Company (Jowsco) under the captaincy of former SA Tourism head Moss Mashishi.
The company's primary task was clear: to put together a comprehensive logistically rigid event.
'We want the logistical part of the summit to be as smooth as possible so that no one complains about anything,' ordered foreign affairs minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma during one of her inspections on the venues.
In response, Jowsco put together a sophisticated transportation system, well coordinated accommodation arrangements and readily available and well-mannered volunteers, who ensured that everything from parking to directions to ushering went smoothly.
Representatives of nearly 200 countries with widely divergent positions, including civil society organisations, converged in Johannesburg and during their two-week stay, grappled with complex and difficult issues.
Thus, it was imperative that they deliberated crucial issues in a safe and secured environment that allowed space for freedom of movement, speech and expression.
As a result, eight thousand extra police officers were dispatched to Johannesburg to boost security; every Summit site was 'swept' in careful security checks and there were regular roadblocks, spot checks and increased policing across Johannesburg, Pretoria, Midrand and Soweto.
The handpicked police officers from every province, had received extra training in diplomacy, weaponry and security skills upgrading.
The security personnel comprised the South African Police Service (SAPS), the South African National Defence Force (SANDF), Tshwane and the Johannesburg Metro Police, the intelligence community and other security agencies.
To put into practice what is inscribed in the country's constitution with regard to freedom of expression, the security personnel displayed what many regarded as a professional conduct that best suited any credible democracy, through their handling of marches and demonstrations that took place during the Summit.
A number of non-governmental organisations marched to the Summit venue to voice their concerns, and police managed to control the crowds with no major incidents reported.
In the process, the security personnel, particularly the intelligence services, intercepted plans by rightwing elements to set off explosives at the Sandton Convention Centre-one of the venues that played host to the Summit.
With delegates experiencing a safe and secure atmosphere it was time for critical issues to come under the hammer. And, as a result a number of issues were agreed upon and a number of partnerships entered into.
Some issues were, however, deadlocked. But, such is the nature of negotiations-premised on the give and take principle.
The agreements reached in Johannesburg set minimum tasks for all governments and people in building a better world.
They were a guide to action that will take forward the UN Millennium Summit Declaration's goal of halving world poverty by 2015, and decisions of world bodies since the Rio Earth Summit 10 years ago.
Some of the major outcomes of the Summit include the halving, by 2015, of the number of people without basic sanitation. Last year the world's leaders agreed to halve the number without access to safe drinking water by 2015. Biodiversity loss is to be reversed by 2010 and collapsed fish stocks restored by 2015, chemicals with detrimental health impact will be phased out by 2020 and the extension of energy services to 35 percent of African households over the next ten years.
In terms of energy and water, South Africa had already made major strides in the provision of the two.
In terms of electricity, over the eight-year period from January 1994 to December 2001, a total of 3.47 million households were connected to the national electricity grid at a cost of R9.9-billion.
This included free basic electricity amounting to 30 kWh per legally connected household per month.
On water, in 2001 almost 7 million people, from the 14 million that had no access in 1994, were receiving clean water including 600 kilolitres of free basic water.
Clearly these feats meant that South Africa had already made headway in implementing some the agreements entered into at the Summit. And this meant one thing: Out of Africa and out of Jo'burg a new agenda for practical action had emerged.
South Africa was lauded internationally for hosting a successful event-free Summit.
'I have never seen a summit as well organised as this one...despite its size,' proclaimed WSSD secretary-general Nitin Desai.
The hosting of the event affirmed the country's status as a progressing state that had defied all the odds to be perceived as a model country for other developing nations.
This, coupled with other accomplishment such as President Mbeki's address at the recent UN General Assembly held in New York in the United States (US), put the country firmly on its way to international recognition and respect. -